BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//wp-events-plugin.com//7.2.2.1//EN
TZID:Europe/Amsterdam
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Amsterdam
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:295@bmi-online.nl
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20220525T183000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20220629T194500
DTSTAMP:20220421T152017Z
URL:https://www.bmi-online.nl/events/challenges-of-scholarly-communication
 -bibliometric-transparency-and-impact-online/
SUMMARY:Challenges of scholarly communication: bibliometric transparency an
 d impact (online)
DESCRIPTION:Analysing self-citations in a large bibliometric database\nBy 
 Philipp Mayr-Schlegel \n\nCitation metrics have value because they aim to
  make scientific assessment a level playing field\, but urgent transparenc
 y-based adjustments are necessary to ensure that measurements yield the mo
 st accurate picture of impact and excellence. One problematic area is the 
 handling of self-citations\, which are either excluded or inappropriately 
 accounted for when using bibliometric indicators for research evaluation. 
 In this talk\, in favour of openly tracking self-citations\, I report on a
  study of self-referencing behaviour among various academic disciplines as
  captured by the curated bibliometric database Web of Science. Specificall
 y\, I examine the behaviour of thousands of authors grouped into 15 subjec
 t areas like Biology\, Chemistry\, Science and Technology\, Engineering\, 
 and Physics. In this talk\, I focus on the methodological set-up of the st
 udy and discuss data science related problems like author name disambiguat
 ion and bibliometric indicator modelling. This talk bases on the following
  publication: Kacem\, A.\, Flatt\, J. W.\, &amp\; Mayr\, P. (2020). Tracki
 ng self-citations in academic publishing. Scientometrics\, 123(2)\, 1157
 –1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03413-9\n\nResearch impact be
 yond scholarly communication: the big challenge of Scientometrics 2.0\nBy
  Pei-Shan Chi &amp\; Wolfgang Glänzel\n\nThe last two decades in the e
 volution of bibliometrics mark a significant turn towards the quantificati
 on and measurement of scientific communication beyond the scholarly one an
 d towards a broader assessment of its various impacts on science and socie
 ty. We summarize the background and the main characteristics of this evolu
 tion\, refer to latest results in our related studies\, and focus on the l
 atent and real challenges in the use of the new metrics designed for the m
 easurement of the broader impact of research. In addition to the critical 
 review several examples are given to illustrate the large potential and ad
 ded value of the new metrics when used judiciously and correctly. In concl
 usion we will address and elaborate the framework of preconditions that ar
 e essential for improving coverage and reliability of both data sources an
 d the metrics derived from those.\n\nMore information.\n\n&nbsp\;\n\n&nbsp
 \;
CATEGORIES:Cursussen en congressen,Webinar
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20220327T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
END:VCALENDAR